Anthony Hopkins

Hearts in Atlantis
$14.98
greatly undervalued KING . SCOTT HICKS is an excellent director (SHINE) . in his very capable hands this film deserves equal status with similar superb KING films as noted in the editorial review above . i'd have liked to see a little more character development . that aside , i find this to be a tremendously absorbing and emotionally wrenching picture . thank you SCOTT . and as always ANTHONY .

The Human Stain
$19.99
Everyone who has seen the film LAWRENCE OF ARABIA remembers how it opens with the death of T. E. Lawrence (Peter O'Toole): he drives his motorcycle off a gravel road to avoid hitting some pedestrians. Similarly, THE HUMAN STAIN begins with the deaths of Coleman Silk (Anthony Hopkins) and his lover, Faunia Farley (Nicole Kidman): Silk drives his car off an icy road to avoid hitting an approaching pickup truck that deliberately swerved into their lane. About 98% of the subsequent parts of both films are giant flashbacks showing us the significant life-choices Lawrence and Silk made and the things they said and did BEFORE that fatal moment.

One of these films is an affirmation, with a kind of summing up; the other is a catalyst or trigger for further thought. In the case of Lawrence, the many remaining scenes arouse our respect and admiration for a heroic historical individual. In that of Silk, we are meant to feel sorrow and compassion for a man with a hidden past--and similar feelings for his lover and for her ex-husband and for almost everyone else in this film--and THEN we are meant to generalize and begin to think about the many flaws in human nature and human society that cause so much suffering for ourselves and for the people we live among: anti-Semitism, racism, classism, ageism, snobbishness, racism, jealousy, hypocricy, cowardice, greed, distrust, racism, selfishness, sexism, puritanism, etc. etc. etc. And did I mention racism yet?

Other reviewers have complained that THE HUMAN STAIN leaves out too many parts of Philip Roth's wonderful novel, that Hopkins has a Welsh accent (would Jeff Bridges have done better?), that the actor playing Silk as a younger man (Wentworth Miller) doesn't look or sound like Hopkins, that the love relationship between Silk and Faunia (who is half his age) is "creepy," etc. etc. etc. For those reviewers, this film did not work; something got in the way. I am pretty certain, too, that for my late parents and for my late sister (as well as a few dozen ex-in-laws), this film would not have worked either--chiefly because of their blatant, lamentable RACISM (which many reviewers avoid discussing). One of the huge ironies of THE HUMAN STAIN is that if Silk's secret had been known to any of his fellow faculty members or townspeople, he would have been hated--and probably murdered--because of that, rather than for his (imaginary) Jewishness or for the May-December aspect of his love affair--with an uneducated "white trash cleaning lady." (By the way, Coleman Silk's fatal relationship with Faunia Farley is bracketed for us in the movie as being somewhere between Pres. Clinton's obsession with Ms. Lewinsky and that of Achilles with Briseis, the slave girl that Agamemnon coveted in THE ILIAD.)

While I was fully conscious of the differences between Miller's and Hopkins' portrayals of Silk, this did not bother me. I thought both actors did fine jobs with their scenes, as did Nicole Kidman (she is especially wonderful when talking with the captive crow!) and Gary Sinise (playing Nathan Zuckerman, who, at the end, is writing about Silk--and who perhaps has been, in a kind of loop, presenting us Silk's story all along, including how Silk met him). Phyllis Newman (an actress I admired forty years ago) does an excellent brief scene as Silk's wife, Iris, who suffers a fatal heart attack when he is falsely accused of being a racist, and Ed Harris is totally believable and totally wonderful as Lester Farley, Kidman's jealous, half-crazy, Vietnam-vet ex-husband (this is the best performance I have ever seen Harris give). Kudos also to Mimi Kuzyk as ambitious Prof. Delphine Roux, who viciously accuses Silk of being a racist.

Do the five stars I gave this film mean I think it is nearly perfect? No--if I were giving it a letter grade, I would rate it about A- (somewhere around a 92 perhaps). Why this high? Because despite its flaws, it DID work for me: it made me feel strongly and care strongly about the characters and their problems and the outcomes of their lives--and it made me continue to ponder them and the broader issues the film raised, not just for a few seconds or minutes or hours, but for several days after watching it. Not many films have had that strong an impact on me. THE MISSION did, and so did A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS (both with screenplays by Robert Bolt, who coincidentally also wrote the screenplay for LAWRENCE OF ARABIA). But not many other films have had this effect--so THE HUMAN STAIN is in very good company.

The World's Fastest Indian
$14.98
as with "SEARCHING FOR BOBBY FISCHER" , but more so , this amazingly gratifying true story (which you can see with the kids) is very smart , well crafted and uplifting . i don't know how long ago it was that ANTHONY HOPKINS established himself as the most mature and exceptional actor of our times . perhaps around 1980 with "THE ELEPHANT MAN" ? perhaps sooner in "MAGIC" . too many fine performances to begin enumerating . one of the best films you'll (hopefully) see .

Instinct
$14.99
I gave it the half-way mark because that it exactly what it is, an attempt to make people feel sympathetic for an "under-manned, inferior" species of animal (picked on, and defeated). The performances are pretty well done, and the music by Danny Elfman suits it pretty well, but, definitely has the underlying theme of trying to make you (yes, I'll say it again) empathize for the gorillas and/or way of life the character of Anthony Hopkins has chosen. However most of the movie follows/tries to cash in on the areas that most of the human race just doesn't care to, or won't, change. The movie will definitely open you up to a new way of thinking about how other species of animals are taken advantage of, yet however, as a person try to capitalize on the thought that you think you have some "magical connection" to them by using much introspective thinking and rebelling if you will of the standard movie cliches. It's a movie at least worth seeing once because maybe it will wake up that part of you that sees things differently and maybe feel more closely related as you should to everything else, but I think just as many people will see it as the attempt to grab you on the exact theme it tries to portray, the inherent fact that people think they should feel bad about things being treated worse than they are, which seems to validate their own actions (even though nobody acts upon them). Don't get me wrong, I am no different however, I've just realized it. Do not think it is all a terrible thing though, watch the movie and honestly try to decide for yourself I'm just saying rent versus buy maybe you want to rent it first.